Interlift Liners or Single Liner Systems: Choosing the Right Design

For hundreds of years, heap leach pads were simple constructions of graded and berm soil with ore piled directly on top of the ground. In the 1960s to 1980s, mine operators finally began to put the various geomembrane products available to good use in lining these pads. Yet, there’s no reason why a heap leaching mound should only feature a single layer of liner at the very bottom. In fact, some of the latest designs in this technique call for lining every lift instead of just the pad. This creates a series of mini-pad layers that can offer a number of benefits over the single liner system.

Resisting Compression

First, interlift liners help reduce the compression effect caused by the accumulated weight of the fines. As the fines press down with each new lift added, it’s easy for compacted areas to develop that crush just some of the pipes or tear through a section of the bottom liner. By adding a liner as every level or every few levels of ore are added, the weight of each lift is better distributed across the entire surface area of the pad. This can prevent both leaks and a lack of leachate flow over time.

Controlling Horizontal Losses

Horizontal losses of leachate aren’t common with most heap leaching mounds, but they can be an issue in valley designs. If the valley isn’t completely bermed and lined, contact between the heaped ore and the surrounding soil can lead to leachate traveling out of the containment area. Interlift liners stop the risk of that kind of loss by ensuring there is no contact between the mound and the soil around the edges of the pad. Each new layer of liner overlaps to create a completely enclosed system. This is important if high levels of lixiviant are used for the extraction process.

Fewer Collapses

Spreading out the weight of each lift as widely as possible does more than just control compression from the force pressing downward on the collection system. It also reduces the chances of sliding and slumping occurring between the layers of material. Isolating each lift that is added with a geomembrane stops vertical cracks and rifts from traveling upward through a heap. This can be a real issue with irrigation since water can always move unevenly through the material and cause it to wash out below the surface. Interlift systems allow for better stabilization at every level, ensuring there’s as little risk of a sudden collapse or shift as possible.

Thicker Lifts

The lifts used today in modern heap leaching are far thinner than the layers once used for the traditional form of this procedure. However, they’re still quite thick on many projects, with average lift height ranging anywhere from just 2 feet to 20 feet or more. The thicker the lift layer, the more likely it needs an interlift liner system to support it. Thicker lifts produce more leachate, and the compaction that occurs between layers can make it hard for large amount of liquid to cross the barrier. Liners help direct that volume to a drainage and storage system rather than allowing it to trickle straight down, reducing the chances of destabilization and other issues.

Greater Total Height

With both greater stability and less compression occurring with an interlift system of liners, it’s possible to build a heap with a far greater total height than with a single layer of liner at the bottom. With demand for heap height growing as leachate techniques improve, it’s not surprising that many operators have pushed the limits to stack ore as high as 300 to 500 feet above the pad. With that much ore in one place, it’s essential to reduce the risks of a collapse or slide as much as possible.

BTL Liners has the products you need for a complete interliner system. Our flexible RPE liners can stabilize each lift of a system for better capture and leachate control. Let our reinforced geomembranes add stability so you can stack the ore fines as high as you like.


Liners by BTL

ArmorPro

ArmorPro is built with the toughest materials for absolute and total containment.

Newest Articles:

Subscribe to Updates

Article Topics

Agriculture Covers Tarps Aquaponics Energy Liners Hydroponics Greenhouse Light Deprivation Water Gardens Farm Ponds Greenhouses Greenhouse Gardening Greenhouse Cover Fish Pond Pond Fish Golf Course Pond Golf Course Water Feature Natural Pond Landfill Cover Irrigation Irrigation Pond Irrigation Canal Hydraulic Fracturing Oil Containment Secondary Containment Fracking Oil Liner Fuel Liner Frac Pit Fire Protection Pond Fire Suppression Pond Fire Pond Geomembrane Canal Liner Brine Pond Koi Pond Algae Pond Nursery Pond Retention Pond Man-Made Lake Lakes Geothermal Greenhouse Commercial Greenhouse Preformed Pond Liner Groundwater Storage Lagoon Mining Pond Mining Lagoon Evaporation Pond Salt Pond Pond Liner Materials Catch Basin Stormwater Management Barren Pond Processing Pond Natural Swimming Pond Drainage Systems Ditch Lining Aquaculture Sewage Lagoon Mining Geomembranes Floating Cover Wastewater Containment Geosynthetics Cistern Lining Erosion Control Fertilizer Containment Winery Water Silage Cover Winery Irrigation Pond Baseball Field Cover Tailings Pond Produced Water Liner Produced Water Pond Produced Water Winery Construction Pond Winter Ponds Fish Hatchery Algae Raceways Coal Ash Containment Fishing Lakes Oilfield Pits Aquatic Habitats Retention Pond Lake Restoration Landfill Cell Liners and Cap Covers Leachate Pond Rain Cover Heap Leach Pads Residential Ponds Processing Pond Gas Collection California Drought California Pond Liner Overburden Containment Pond Liner Fish Stocking Pond Mine Reclamation Wastewater Cover Drought Irrigation Reservoir Sludge Management Cable Parks Baffle Systems Alternative Daily Covers Desalination Reservoir Pond Aeroponics Food Shortages